Discuss the influence of community culture and religion in

Discuss the influence of community culture and religion in

This unit provides students with a foundational understanding of culture and its implications for health care. Topics such as culture self and diversity understanding and valuing Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander cultures cross cultural health and wellness and migrant health issues will be explored throughout the unit. Additionally the concept of values and ethical principles within health care communities will be introduced.Learning Outcomes.Students will:Discuss the influence of community culture and religion in influencing health care practice.Evaluate the distribution of healthcare resources in relation to healthcare needs and concepts of health and wellbeing.Justify a position on the influence that globalisation will have on nursing workforce culture.Appraise social and ethical wellbeing within the context of equity and cultural safety.Discuss the concept of Indigeneity and critically compare the demography context and lifestyles of different cultural and Indigenous groups.Explore and describe contemporary Australian Indigenous health services organisations and issues and include the socio-cultural factors that impede health care provision.Content areas may include:Culture and cultural groups.Frameworks for analysis of context and lifestyles of different cultural groups.Health wellness care illness and spirituality.Self and diversityUnderstanding health service provision related to cultural healthMigrant health.NCS2202 Sem 1 2017 C. SquireTask description:Assignment one consists of two parts.Assignment 1 Part 1 (Module 1).One word document submitted to Turnitin consisting of the following.3 Insights copied from discussion board one from each week of module one. [CONTRIBUTION] Best reply to another students post from any of the three weeks copied from discussion board. [SHARE] Essay (750 words) of one selected insight that links with your practice. [APPLY] Assignment 1 Part 2 (Module 2).This will have the same three component parts as Assignment 1 Part 1 but relates to module two.These two pieces of work are developed in a way that will assist you with preparation for the final assessment piece ( Ass 3) a 2000 word reflective essay.Process and Protocols for Posting and Contribution.Discussion Board. [Contribute and Share] In this unit online discussion will count towards your first assignment grade. The purpose of the discussion forum is to frame and promote collaborative learning and critical thinking. Active and regular participation is required for your lecturer and/or tutor to see and is also important to assist you to develop your thoughts and positions on the various topics presented to improve application to practiceDiscussion Board1. On completion of each weeks work (lecture readings and tutorial activities) create a list of insights that you have gained. INSIGHTS (Light bulb moments). are intuitive moments that we gain as we learn. Grab hold of them as they occur and be prepared to share them on the discussion board.2. Select one of the insights that you would like to discuss with your peers and create a discussion board post with a suitable descriptive heading.3. Respectfully respond to each others postings and threads supporting or refuting the ideas presented.4. Each student will post a minimum of 3 postings per module. (one per week).NCS2202 Sem 1 2017 C. SquireGuidelines:Be succinct in your thoughts and ideas explaining why you take this view with supporting evidence taken from your research include a reference a link or a citation when appropriate. (A short statement of I agree or I disagree) is not sufficient.Word count should be NO more than a paragraph. ( 200-300 words)Stay on topicBe reflective in your approach perhaps applying any experiences you may have had on prac that support your ideas (de identified). Be relevant and attempt to motivate discussion.Use appropriate etiquette grammar and spelling.Written piece of work.Written piece of work [Apply] At the end of Module 1 and Module 2 ( see timetable for dates) you will submit a short reflective essay (750 words) through TurnitinThe submitted work will include:1. A copy of your best response to another students post (not part of the word count).2. A copy of your three contributions (3) from discussion board (not part of the word count).3. Select the one (1) insight that best resonates with you and write a short reflective essay (750 words) that summarises your learning with inclusion of how you have / or will apply this knowledge to your practice.4. Your reference list should include at least one new resource that supports your point of view. This must be from credible sources. (A book peer reviewed journal articles a news item film web site and or professional documents).5. It is necessary for you to justify your ideas/position by applying the knowledge gained through the materials presented your own research as well as your discussions on DB and In your tutorials (ON and OFF campus).NB: Students will be randomly allocated a tutorial discussion group. These may not be the same as your regular tutorial group.*Please listen to the audio provided in the Ass 1 folder for clarity.NCS2202 Sem 1 2017 C. SquireFormatEach piece of work is to be written in first and third person (see videos and exemplars on writing reflectively for assistance) and formatted as per School of Nursing and Midwifery Assignment Writing Guidelines. These are located in the Assessment folder.References cited must be correct APA. It is necessary to support your ideas with at least 3 citationsYour work is to be submitted through Turnitin.A rubric has been created to assist and guide you with the requirements of each of the assignment pieces.Further information can be found in:Grellier J. and Goerke V. (2010). (2nd Ed.). Communications Skills Toolkit: Unlocking the secrets of tertiary success. Cengage Learning: Melbourne Victoria.NCS2202 Sem 1 2017 C. SquireNCS2202 Ass 1 Discussion Board Marking Rubric. (Maximum Mark 15%)Below Average. (0)Poor( 2.5)Satisfactory (5.0)Good (7.5)Exemplary (10.0)Fails to meet the criteria for this assessment.Meets some of the criteria at an unacceptable levelMeets basic requirementsMeets all requirements at a proficient levelMeets required criteria at a highly proficient levelResponses to othersReply does not address the postingDisrespects the views of peersReply does not refer to the posting(s) directly or simple agrees or disagrees without explanation.Reply supports or refutes others postings/ ideas at the same time respecting their views with the use of academic and non-threatening language.Reply supports or refutes others postings with respect and introduces a new topic or concept.Reply supports and or refutes others postings with respect. Provides additional evidence to the ideas as well as an alternate viewKnowledge of subjectNo understanding of central concepts displayedDisplays a minimal grasp of the concepts.Does not expand on the central concepts.Demonstrate a basic knowledge of the topic without applying theory or expanding ideas.Presents new or expanded ideas with some demonstration of critical thinkingIdeas reflect high level critical thinking with application to theoretical knowledge and demonstration of practical application.Evidence of researchLack of appropriate research. No citations listed.Some research used but not at academic standard i.e. Wiki. Citations have many errors.Research used mix of academic and non-academic citations with errors.Academic research clearly connected to the ideas presented with minimal error in citations.Significant research applied to support and extend ideas presented.Application to practiceNo evidence of applicationTo practiceBasic application of learning applied to practice; no cohesion of ideas.Some demonstration of original thought with some connection between the topic and practiceOriginal thought apparent with good application of course material and learning to practice.Original thought apparent throughout; clear application of course material and knowledge to practiceOrganisation and clarity.Poor presentation. Substantial errorsPoorly presented piece of work with errors and weak sentence structure.Minimal errors in grammar punctuation and spelling. Sentence structure correct but basic.Minimal errors. Varied sentence structureNo errors. Use of compound sentence structure.

 

"You need a similar assignment done from scratch? Our qualified writers will help you with a guaranteed AI-free & plagiarism-free A+ quality paper, Confidentiality, Timely delivery & Livechat/phone Support.


Discount Code: CIPD30


Click ORDER NOW..

order custom paper